Role-based access
Client, therapist, support, reviewer, and administrator views expose different controls. A production service should grant each role only the access needed for its work.
Seansio’s interface demonstrates privacy-conscious workflows. Real compliance depends on the deployed service, contracts, risk assessment, technical configuration, operating practices, and jurisdiction.
Client, therapist, support, reviewer, and administrator views expose different controls. A production service should grant each role only the access needed for its work.
The demo includes password, two-factor authentication, device, and session-management flows. Production controls would also require secure identity proofing, recovery, and monitoring.
A production implementation handling health data would require appropriate encryption, key management, secure transport, protected storage, and tested disposal procedures.
Therapist identity, license evidence, renewal status, profile content, and review queues are separated so verification decisions can be documented and revisited.
Administrative screens illustrate access history, review activity, support tickets, and operational alerts. Real systems need monitored logs, incident procedures, and accountable owners.
Session media, messages, voice notes, and uploads require access controls, retention decisions, and vendor safeguards. This demo uses previews and does not transmit clinical media.
Hosting, communications, payments, storage, backups, and recovery providers must be assessed for the data they handle and configured under appropriate agreements.
This frontend remake does not claim HIPAA certification or legal compliance and does not process real patient records. Interface labels alone cannot establish compliance.